Proof, not promises. This page replays PokéAlpha's Fair Value discounts and Opportunity Scores against history to measure whether high-scoring assets actually went on to outperform — by hit-rate, realized return, and the equity curve of acting on the top signals.
Yes — high-conviction signals beat the market 52% of the time over 30 days, a modest and measurable edge (long/short spread +3.5%, IC 0.07).
Measured over 40 weekly as-of dates across 360 tracked assets (28,800 point-in-time signals), from Aug 9 to May 11.
How often a high-conviction signal (top quintile by Opportunity Score on each date) beat the equal-weight market, and the average benchmark-relative return it earned.
If the score is real, the top cohort should out-earn the bottom cohort over the same window. The long/short spread is that gap in benchmark-relative return.
| Horizon | Cohort | Signals | Avg return | vs market | Hit-rate | Long/short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30-day | High conviction | 2880 | +3.1% | +2.0% | 52% | +3.5% |
| Low conviction | 2880 | -0.4% | -1.5% | 44% | ||
| 90-day | High conviction | 2880 | +5.2% | +3.4% | 52% | +6.0% |
| Low conviction | 2880 | -0.8% | -2.7% | 41% |
A portfolio that rebalances monthly into the 15 highest-scoring assets (equal-weighted, net of turnover cost) versus simply holding the whole market.
The Spearman rank correlation between a signal's score and its realized forward return. 0 means no predictive power; a small positive value (0.03–0.10) is a genuine, usable edge in real-world quant terms.
A backtest is only trustworthy if it can't cheat. Here is exactly how these numbers are produced — point-in-time, with no look-ahead, measured against the market, not in a vacuum.